3 | | HOWEVER, my wishes are irrelevant: Although it is NOT documented, the CODE is written that way [jQuery source 1.5.1 - check the stackoverflow.com discussion I referred you to, in original report]. What I say, is that you should make a decision, and implement it. Having selectedIndex = -1 doesn't solve problems, it creates them. jQuery's primary objective (I believe) should be "to be standards-compliant AND cross-browser, useful tool that DOES function", not just "to be standards-compliant tool that follows those standards to no end". selectedIndex = -1 doesn't serve anyone... |
| 3 | HOWEVER, my wishes are irrelevant: Although it is NOT documented, the CODE is written that way [jQuery source 1.5.1 - check the stackoverflow.com discussion I referred you to, in original report]. What I say, is that you should make a decision, and implement it. Having selectedIndex = -1 doesn't solve problems, it creates them. jQuery's primary objective (I believe) should be "to be standards-compliant AND cross-browser, useful tool that DOES function", not just "to be standards-compliant tool that follows those standards blindly, to no end". selectedIndex = -1 doesn't serve anyone... |