#773 closed enhancement (fixed)
appendTo object notation support
| Reported by: | Owned by: | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Priority: | trivial | Milestone: | 1.1 |
| Component: | core | Version: | 1.1 |
| Keywords: | Cc: | ||
| Blocked by: | Blocking: |
Description
How about support of "appendTo" in object notation form,not only expession.Why "append" has expression and object notation but appendTo is different and supports only expression flavor?I seems as inconsistency to me.
Change History (3)
comment:1 Changed 16 years ago by
comment:2 Changed 16 years ago by
Sorry,appendTo has equally adequate support for object notation as append(I've checked),that was api documentation "inconsistency":-) But generic support for object/expression would be nice anyway,isn't it?If it's already there,just pin this important aspect on top of api page. Thanks.
comment:3 Changed 16 years ago by
| Resolution: | → fixed |
|---|---|
| Status: | new → closed |
Alright, we'll fix up the docs to note this.
Note: See
TracTickets for help on using
tickets.
Anyway,support of "expression"/object/object,object,.../array must be interchangable and universal across framework-that's cornerstone I presume.