Side navigation
#6543 closed bug (worksforme)
Opened May 07, 2010 06:20AM UTC
Closed May 07, 2010 05:40PM UTC
:visible and :nth-child selector
| Reported by: | coplas | Owned by: | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Priority: | Milestone: | 1.4.3 | |
| Component: | core | Version: | 1.4.2 |
| Keywords: | visible nth-child | Cc: | |
| Blocked by: | Blocking: |
Description
there is a problem with not visible elements
(in my case TRs)
".tab tr:visible:even"
works as expected,
but
"tr:visible:nth-child(2n-1)"
not, it probably matches not only visible but all elements.
example:
$(function() {
$("#t1 tr:eq(3)").hide();
$("#t2 tr:eq(3)").hide();
$(".tab tr:visible:even").addClass("even");
$(".tab tr:visible:nth-child(even)").addClass("even2");
});
Attachments (0)
Change History (1)
Changed May 07, 2010 05:40PM UTC by comment:1
| resolution: | → worksforme |
|---|---|
| status: | new → closed |
Note that
and are 0-based and apply to the entire collection (with tr elements crossing two tables in this example ) whereas is 1-based and applies to the sibling order regardless of visibility. Whether the tr is visible or not does not affect the selector; it is still that child whether it is visible or not. When I look at the markup in Firebug it doesn't seem that the hidden elements ever have even2 applied to them so it seems like the combination worked properly.