Changes between Initial Version and Version 1 of Ticket #14659, comment 3
- Timestamp:
- Dec 31, 2013, 5:35:01 PM (9 years ago)
Legend:
- Unmodified
- Added
- Removed
- Modified
-
Ticket #14659, comment 3
initial v1 1 While this is not high priority, I think I would prefer to use the for-in loop to save a few bytes. Supporting `Object.prototype` augmentation is not something we've pursued historically and I don't think we would want to make the necessary changes to the 1.x branch to keep it consistent with 2.x if we wanted to start.1 While this is not high priority, I think I would prefer to use the for-in loop to save a few bytes. That is, if the argument is for consistency, the bytes would add up if we used `Object.keys` ubiquitously. Supporting `Object.prototype` augmentation is not something we've pursued historically and I don't think we would want to make the necessary changes to the 1.x branch to keep it consistent with 2.x if we wanted to start.