Bug Tracker

Changes between Initial Version and Version 1 of Ticket #14659, comment 3


Ignore:
Timestamp:
Dec 31, 2013, 5:35:01 PM (9 years ago)
Author:
Timmy Willison
Comment:

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified
  • Ticket #14659, comment 3

    initial v1  
    1 While this is not high priority, I think I would prefer to use the for-in loop to save a few bytes. Supporting `Object.prototype` augmentation is not something we've pursued historically and I don't think we would want to make the necessary changes to the 1.x branch to keep it consistent with 2.x if we wanted to start.
     1While this is not high priority, I think I would prefer to use the for-in loop to save a few bytes. That is, if the argument is for consistency, the bytes would add up if we used `Object.keys` ubiquitously. Supporting `Object.prototype` augmentation is not something we've pursued historically and I don't think we would want to make the necessary changes to the 1.x branch to keep it consistent with 2.x if we wanted to start.