Side navigation
#9394 closed feature (wontfix)
Opened May 22, 2011 07:16PM UTC
Closed June 07, 2011 06:53PM UTC
nextUntil/prevUntil take functions
| Reported by: | sam.korn@cantab.net | Owned by: | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Priority: | low | Milestone: | 1.7 |
| Component: | traversing | Version: | 1.6.1 |
| Keywords: | 1.7-discuss | Cc: | |
| Blocked by: | Blocking: |
Description
It would be nice if nextUntil and prevUntil could take callbacks rather than selector strings. So the callback would be executed on each sibling in turn. When the function returns true, the selection should end. This would mean that complex selectors would be unnecessary: it would be possible to specify a much more readable (and, I'd guess, faster) function instead.
Attachments (0)
Change History (11)
Changed May 22, 2011 07:27PM UTC by comment:1
| keywords: | → 1.7-discuss |
|---|
Changed May 22, 2011 08:31PM UTC by comment:2
-1, can be achieved with existing API
Changed May 23, 2011 01:05AM UTC by comment:3
-1, I dunno, I'd expect selection to be faster and faster... so the idea a function called on all elements of a superset of a selection will be faster :/
Changed May 23, 2011 05:08AM UTC by comment:4
-1, inflation
Changed May 24, 2011 12:59AM UTC by comment:5
| component: | unfiled → traversing |
|---|---|
| priority: | undecided → low |
| status: | new → open |
Changed May 24, 2011 10:25PM UTC by comment:6
-1, Creep of the feature kind.
Changed June 03, 2011 02:11PM UTC by comment:7
-1, Ehh, not terribly excited by this.
Changed June 05, 2011 10:34PM UTC by comment:8
+0, Seems like feature creep, but not unreasonable....
Changed June 06, 2011 02:55PM UTC by comment:9
-1
Changed June 06, 2011 03:38PM UTC by comment:10
+0, I don't think this actually would be more readable
Changed June 07, 2011 06:53PM UTC by comment:11
| milestone: | 1.next → 1.7 |
|---|---|
| resolution: | → wontfix |
| status: | open → closed |
Closing per 1.7 roadmap meeting resolution
Nominating ticket for 1.7 discussion.