jQuery.ajax fails when only the URL parameter is provided

Reported by:	danheberden	Owned by:	danheberden
Priority:	low	Milestone:	1.5.1
Component:	ajax	Version:	1.5
Keywords:		Cc:	jaubourg
Blocked by:		Blocking:

Description

$.ajax( 'url' ); fails with

Chrome:
Uncaught TypeError: Cannot use 'in' operator to search for 'context' in /echo/html

FF4:
Error: invalid 'in' operand options
Source File: http://code.jquery.com/jquery-git.js
Line: 6352

If the settings object (even if just {} ) is present, it works fine. Also, looks like unit tests passed cuz it was just calling $.ajax();

http://jsfiddle.net/danheberden/u9qsW/

Attachments (0)

Change History (7)

Changed January 31, 2011 11:07PM UTC by danheberden comment:1

cc:	→ jaubourg
component:	unfiled → ajax
description:	$.ajax( 'url' ); fails with \ \ Uncaught TypeError: Cannot use 'in' operator to search for 'context' in /echo/html \ \ If the settings object (even if just {} ) is present, it works fine. Also, looks like unit tests passed cuz it was just calling $.ajax(); \ \ http://jsfiddle.net/danheberden/u9qsW/ → $.ajax( 'url' ); fails with \ \ \ {{{ \ Uncaught TypeError: Cannot use 'in' operator to search for 'context' in /echo/html \ }}} \ \ If the settings object (even if just {} ) is present, it works fine. Also, looks like unit tests passed cuz it was just calling $.ajax(); \ \ http://jsfiddle.net/danheberden/u9qsW/
priority:	undecided → low
status:	new → open

Changed January 31, 2011 11:10PM UTC by danheberden comment:2

description:	$.ajax( 'url' ); fails with \ \ \ {{{ \ Uncaught TypeError: Cannot use 'in' operator to search for 'context' in /echo/html \ }}} \ \ If the settings object (even if just {} ) is present, it works fine. Also, looks like unit tests passed cuz it was just calling $.ajax(); \ \ http://jsfiddle.net/danheberden/u9qsW/ → $.ajax( 'url' ); fails with \ \ \ {{{ \ Chrome: \ Uncaught TypeError: Cannot use 'in' operator to search for 'context' in /echo/html \ \ FF4: \ Error: invalid 'in' operand options \ Source File: http://code.jquery.com/jquery-git.js \ Line: 6352 \ }}} \ \ If the settings object (even if just {} ) is present, it works fine. Also, looks like unit tests passed cuz it was just calling $.ajax(); \ \ http://jsfiddle.net/danheberden/u9qsW/

description:

$.ajax( 'url' ); fails with \ \ \ {{{ \ Uncaught TypeError: Cannot use 'in' operator to search for 'context' in /echo/html \ }}} \ \ If the settings object (even if just {} ) is present, it works fine. Also, looks like unit tests passed cuz it was just calling $.ajax(); \ \ http://jsfiddle.net/danheberden/u9qsW/ → $.ajax( 'url' ); fails with \ \ \ {{{ \ Chrome: \ Uncaught TypeError: Cannot use 'in' operator to search for 'context' in /echo/html \ \ FF4: \ Error: invalid 'in' operand options \ Source File: http://code.jquery.com/jquery-git.js \ Line: 6352 \ }}} \ \ If the settings object (even if just {} ) is present, it works fine. Also, looks like unit tests passed cuz it was just calling $.ajax(); \ \ http://jsfiddle.net/danheberden/u9qsW/

Changed January 31, 2011 11:33PM UTC by rwaldron comment:3

owner:	→ danheberden
status:	open → assigned

Confirmed

Changed February 01, 2011 05:46AM UTC by danheberden comment:4

https://github.com/jquery/jquery/pull/219

Changed February 01, 2011 08:35AM UTC by danheberden comment:5

resolution:	→ fixed
status:	assigned → closed

Fixed: https://github.com/jquery/jquery/commit/31949fa528141dad4b92851212677b039cb23cfb

Changed February 01, 2011 11:56AM UTC by jitter comment:6

milestone:	1.next → 1.5.1

Changed February 02, 2011 04:47AM UTC by timmywil comment:7

Ah cool, just found this bug myself.

Side navigation

#8107 closed bug (fixed)