Skip to main content

Bug Tracker

Side navigation

#3539 closed feature (fixed)

Opened October 28, 2008 08:53PM UTC

Closed December 30, 2008 11:26AM UTC

Expose the queueing system, make it generic and create a 'data' module

Reported by: flesler Owned by: flesler
Priority: major Milestone: 1.3
Component: data Version: 1.2.6
Keywords: Cc: john, joern, brandon, davidserduke
Blocked by: Blocking:
Description

I propose putting all the data/queue functions and related variables into a new module, called data.

Also expose the generic queueing function that is actually a local function.

I also want to make it generic, along with dequeue. Both are merely intended for animations.

Attachments (1)
Change History (5)

Changed October 30, 2008 12:48AM UTC by flesler comment:1

description: This function can be really useful. \ Pretty much like jQuery.data, this accepts element,key,[value].I propose putting all the data/queue functions and related variables into a new module, called data. \ \ Also expose the generic queueing function that is actually a local function. \ I also want to make it generic, along with dequeue. Both are merely intended for animations. \ \
status: newassigned
summary: Expose the queue function as jQuery.queueExpose the queueing system, make it generic and create a 'data' module

Changed October 30, 2008 12:51AM UTC by flesler comment:2

cc: → john, joern, brandon, davidserduke
need: PatchCommit

I run the suite on most browsers and tried this much.

Changed October 30, 2008 01:41AM UTC by john comment:3

Looks good to me! I'm not a huge fan of .nextAnim() (seems like it's used so infrequently to begin with, we could probably just inline it) but that's something that we can always mess with later.

Changed October 30, 2008 01:43AM UTC by flesler comment:4

I don't like the name either and yes, making it private sounds good to me too.

Changed December 30, 2008 11:26AM UTC by flesler comment:5

component: fxdata
resolution: → fixed
status: assignedclosed

Applied at [6010-6012].