Side navigation
#2291 closed bug (fixed)
Opened February 07, 2008 11:15AM UTC
Closed February 11, 2008 02:56AM UTC
resizable: redundant options? (o.aspectRatio / o.ratio)
Reported by: | c_t | Owned by: | braeker |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | major | Milestone: | 1.2.3 |
Component: | ui | Version: | 1.2.2 |
Keywords: | Cc: | ||
Blocked by: | Blocking: |
Description
As far as I understand the code if I want a resizable to preserve its aspect ratio I have to specify o.aspectRatio = true .
If I want to force a specific aspectRatio I have to additionaly specify the option e.g. o.ratio = 0.5 .
I think one option would be enough and suggest the following behaviour:
- o.aspectRatio = false -> Aspect ratio is not preserved
- o.aspectRatio = true -> On the first resize the aspect ratio is calculated from the element's dimensions and stored internally. I would not recommend recalculating the aspect ratio on every resize since this will lead to rounding errors after some resizes.
- o.aspectRatio = float -> If a floating point number is given that aspect ratio is forced upon the first resize.
To summarize I think there should not be an additional o.ratio-option but the o.aspectRatio option should be used to control everything concerning the aspectRatio-preservation.