Side navigation
#12611 closed bug (invalid)
Opened September 26, 2012 04:56AM UTC
Closed October 11, 2012 08:54AM UTC
ajax() calls success under certain failure conditions
Reported by: | darius@dons.net.au | Owned by: | darius@dons.net.au |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | undecided | Milestone: | None |
Component: | unfiled | Version: | 1.4.2 |
Keywords: | Cc: | ||
Blocked by: | Blocking: |
Description
I have a page which uses ajax() to load some JSON like so..
$.ajax({'url' : 'array-status.json', 'dataType' : 'json', 'data' : args, 'success' : updatestatus, 'error' : function(jqXHR, textStatus, errorThrown) { disable_spinner(); $("#errortxt").html("Unable to load antenna data: " + jqXHR.status + " (" + jqXHR.statusText + ")"); }, 'cache' : false }); }
If I kill the web server (a flask instance) I find that the success call back is executed. If the backend is alive but returns an error it behaves as I expect (ie the error call back is executed).
The jqXHR looks like..
qXHR XMLHttpRequest abort: function () { onabort: null onerror: null onload: null onloadend: null onloadstart: null onprogress: null onreadystatechange: function () {} readyState: 4 response: "" responseText: "" responseType: "" responseXML: null status: 0 statusText: "" upload: XMLHttpRequestUpload withCredentials: false __proto__: XMLHttpRequest
This is using Chrome 22.0.1229.64 beta.
Attachments (0)
Change History (2)
Changed September 27, 2012 01:33AM UTC by comment:1
owner: | → darius@dons.net.au |
---|---|
status: | new → pending |
Changed October 11, 2012 08:54AM UTC by comment:2
resolution: | → invalid |
---|---|
status: | pending → closed |
Because we get so many tickets, we often need to return them to the initial reporter for more information. If that person does not reply within 14 days, the ticket will automatically be closed, and that has happened in this case. If you still are interested in pursuing this issue, feel free to add a comment with the requested information and we will be happy to reopen the ticket if it is still valid. Thanks!
Can you try it on a released Chrome browser and see if the problem is still there? If not you should definitely be reporting this to the Chrome team and not here. Also, a complete test case would help.